Friday 16 October 2015

When bubbles burst

I'm writing fewer posts than I used to. Earlier this year, this was due to a heavy freelance workload. But recently, it has become much more than that. I'm finding it very difficult to write, because I no longer trust my own ability. I have a crisis of confidence.

My confidence crisis started about six months ago, in the sequence of events that led to my resignation from Pieria. In March, I was asked to write six posts of a 10-post series of "think pieces" for the Design Council, which would be published on Pieria and Medium. I was at the time sole editor of original content on Pieria, but this series was to be separate from the main site and would therefore be under the control of the Design Council's appointed editor.

I'm not going to go into details about exactly what went wrong. Suffice it to say, that I only completed one of the six pieces. The first draft was sent back for changes and further research, and I produced a second draft a few days before going to Washington for the INET conference on 6th May. The initial feedback from the Design Council editor was "It's GREAT". So off I went to Washington believing that the piece was complete.

On 6th May, while sitting in the IMF conference hall listening to Christine Lagarde, I received an email from the commercial director at Pieria. The email informed me that the Design Council editor had rejected the completed piece, on the grounds that it did not match the style of other pieces in the series that had already been completed by another journalist. He had also killed the second piece that I was in the process of writing, and had demanded that I be removed from the project.

To say this was a shock was an understatement. I desperately needed reassurance, so I sent the rejected piece for independent editorial evaluation. The response was amazingly positive. I also sent it to my co-editor at Pieria, who was also positive. On that basis I took the decision to publish the piece on Pieria on the main part of the site (unconnected with the Design Council series), under my own by-line and with a different title.

Unfortunately that decision turned out to be disastrous. The commercial director, presumably concerned that the Design Council would object to the piece being published when they had rejected it, refused to publish it. It remained hidden in the editorial section of the site. Not only that, but all my other work was wiped from the front page of the site, including guest posts I had published on behalf of others on my own profile. This was the action that caused me to resign. I no longer had confidence that any work I did would be published. My position was untenable.

Pieria was a terrible loss. However, I expected that my freelance work would continue. But it didn't. Over the summer months, it all but dried up. Publications for which I had done a lot of work over the previous year stopped commissioning me to write for them. At first I thought this was just a seasonal slowdown, and things would pick up in the autumn. But summer turned to autumn, and no more work appeared.....

Fortunately, a friend of mine recommended me to work with an agency on a content development campaign for a well-known financial services company. I submitted a portfolio of my work to them, which the senior managing editor said was "outstanding". On the strength of that and my editorial experience, I was interviewed for the editorship of the campaign. Unfortuately I was passed over in favour of someone who knew the platform better. But I happily agreed to write for the campaign.

To start with, things appeared to go well. I was assigned my first piece at the beginning of September and completed it on time. Other pieces followed.

But then the edits started....

I discovered that every piece I wrote was being substantially revised or rewritten by the editor. When I asked why, I was told that my writing was "dry and pointless". Apparently I was the worst writer on the campaign. Just as I had been on the Design Council campaign for Pieria.

I don't know what to believe any more. I thought I was a good writer. But the feedback I've been getting in the last few months says otherwise. Maybe I've been misleading myself about my ability.

I started writing because I believed I had something useful to contribute. But perhaps I don't. Perhaps this has all just been a bubble, and now the bubble has burst....

When bubbles burst, they cause widespread confusion and chaos. My bubble is no different from any other bubble. So I am confused, and my mind is in chaos. I no longer trust my judgment about my writing, or anyone else's for that matter. How can I, when pieces that I think are good are heavily revised, rewritten or rejected?

I don't know what I'm doing any more. I don't know where I'm going. I reduced my singing teaching substantially, partly for health reasons but partly to make room for writing. The writing seems to be leaving me, and the singing teaching is not returning - not that I really want it to, but at least it paid the bills. I have no idea how I will survive.

 It all seems so unfair. I've worked so hard, but working hard is not good enough.

Constantly in the back of my mind is a comment I read once about bloggers, that they stop blogging when they run out of things to say. Have I run out of things to say? No, but I seem to have run out of the means to say them.

I never expected to reach this point. But does anyone ever expect a bubble to burst?

12 comments:

  1. you are on a blacklist
    nobody wants a free minded journalist anymore
    wish you the best

    ReplyDelete
  2. free minded journalist like you are not welcomed anymore
    sad truth

    ReplyDelete
  3. Frances: I always enjoy reading your blogs. Often I agree with your position, Sometimes I don't. I always enjoy the way you say it. Keep saying it. You are a unique and interesting voice!
    Roger

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry to hear that. I'm not in the same position, but do recognise the frustrating feeling (up to burnout like feelings) of working hard and not getting the results you deserve.
    If you'd ask me I'd say it's not your writing but these specific two editors. Your articles are always at the top of my reading list.

    Maybe 'editorial' work in the online publishing world nowadays means "make articles click-bait worthy" or something?

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's a real shame that you find yourself in this situation. I regularly read your writing, and it's always well-written and thoughtful. I've learnt so much from it over the years. I really hope things improve for you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Words are cheap, and I suppose that that's the problem. But for what it's worth I think your work is beautifully written and reasoned, and conveys real intellectual excitement about the subject and its arguments. I am someone with a fledgling interest in finance and economics, and a job that involves writing about very technical subjects: for me your work is inspirational.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Frances:

    I'm sorry to read you're having a bad time of it. Writing can be an awful thing to do.

    I thought of this blog a couple of days ago, as it happens when I wrote the line 'The paradox of sovereign knowledge is the base material of economics'. In the thing I'm writing I talk a little about an essay by Deirdre Mccloskey 'If you so smart, why ain't you rich?' http://www.deirdremccloskey.com/docs/pdf/Article_168.pdf

    If you've not read it before, I encourage you to take a look. You might find it helpful in your current predicament. In brief: it might not be your own limit you've hit, it might be the limit of expertise, itself.

    Anyway, best of luck and good wishes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Right...

    I read a lot of blog stuff. You stand out as one of the clearer thinkers and writers. I have many times been left in awe of your thinking and writing.

    Your writing is informative, honest and clear. It answers to no one. Your write beautifully.

    (It sort of amazes me that you have had a crisis of confidence. Not from a 'poor France's point of view but rather from my thoughts of 'what does it take to be recognised/valued!'

    It is a jungle of sh*t out there. You provide clarity. Don't stop doing so.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Right...

    I read a lot of blog stuff. You stand out as one of the clearer thinkers and writers. I have many times been left in awe of your thinking and writing.

    Your writing is informative, honest and clear. It answers to no one. Your write beautifully.

    (It sort of amazes me that you have had a crisis of confidence. Not from a 'poor France's point of view but rather from my thoughts of 'what does it take to be recognised/valued!'

    It is a jungle of sh*t out there. You provide clarity. Don't stop doing so.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am sad to hear that you are in this awful situation. I like your writings in Coppola Comment, although I do not always agree with what you wrote . I have no doubt you are a very good writer. I knew your blog from a link in Noahpinion blog. The fact that Noah put your blog in his reading list , I believe, proves that you have a wide readership.
    Keep writing and do not lose your confidence. GBU.

    Johanes - Indonesia






    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm astounded at this post. I mean utterly astounded. I follow about 50 blogs and you are one of the handful of financial writers I follow... and I read every single word you write. Even though I'm from the US and you usually write of European affairs.

    I even just read your entire post about WASPI's. Why? When it has less than nothing to do with me? Because I enjoy good writing. Your understanding of human nature, the people behind the finance, is why I read all that you write.

    I know something of writing, online and in books, as I run and ghost write for our online business based on my wife's profession (elementary teaching, search for "Classroom Caboodle" if you are interested). Based on what I've learned over the last six years, I'm launching my own blog/business based on my personal insights within the next couple of months.

    So I'm always eager to read the writing of people who can make the complex understandable, who tell the real reason why something is happening, who explain human incentives and how they relate to outcomes. I value people who can peel back the layers. You are one of those people.

    I've been under the impression from Coppola Comment (I've been reading it for about a year), that you were literally a colossus in the field of financial opinion. I still feel that way, but now I respect your insights into the realities of life even more highly after reading several articles from this blog.

    The internet is filled with a near infinity of banal garbage, of authors who sound virtually the same, presided over by content managers ("editor" would be too high a compliment) who work diligently to churn out this sameness. I hope that you don't let them crush your (literary) voice. The vast majority of people who are in a position to formally judge lack vision or any true desire to improve the intellectual lives of the populace.

    I'll keep reading and I hope you'll keep writing. You are one of those people who I wish would write longer works, books that make connections unseen by most people, connecting dots that point to the future. Works that don't have to please editors' agendas. I've added this blog to my reader to be sure I won't miss anything you write here in the future.

    As always I write too much. I don't have much to offer someone of your abilities, but if you ever want input on anything related to running an online business, promotion, Amazon/Kindle books, working with virtual contractors, etc. then I'd be happy to offer up my thoughts.

    Scott Weigle
    scowei@gmail.com
    Spokane, Washington state

    ReplyDelete
  12. Frances,

    I have only just read this so apologies if it is no longer an issue but I would like to reassure you about your abilities as a writer. You are well informed, articulate and by no means "dry and pointless". This too shall pass.

    We sometimes think irrationally when bad stuff happens. You should not doubt your abilities but rather recognise that some of the people who are editing, revising or rejecting your work have alternative agendas. Some of those differences may have absolutely nothing to do with you but some commercial imperative. Having worked for investment banks and published many research notes, I know that the commercial imperative and managing editor are bed fellows all too often.

    As for having nothing to write about, that too is something you should not worry about. There is far too much political and economic chicanery afoot for you not to want to comment upon it. I, for one, always look forward to reading it.

    Have a good Christmas and I hope that 2016 is better for you than 2015 appears to have been.

    ReplyDelete